
Ask about the ground, the access, or the packout — every answer cites the datasets it came from.
I've got five days of second rifle, solo, truck camping, decent shape. I'm between two units I've never set foot in — 18 and 28. What should I be weighing?

Here's how they stack up for five days of second rifle, solo, out of a truck camp:
| Unit 18 | Unit 28 |
|---|
| Herd (2025 post-hunt) | 3,220 | 2,660 |
| Bull:cow ratio | 29:100 | 26:100 |
| Success rate (recent) | 9–13% | 5–8% |
| Hunter density | 34 days/sq mi | 17 days/sq mi |
| Huntable public land | 64% | 67% |
| Prime burn regrowth | 194,000 ac (East Troublesome) | 14,700 ac (Williams Fork) |
Unit 18 carries the stronger harvest numbers — 9–13% success over the last three seasons against 28's 5–8% — and the East Troublesome burn is a real feed signal: 194,000 acres inside the 4–10-year regrowth window that scores highest for food. The trade is pressure — hunter density runs about twice 28's — and a herd that's slid from 4,145 to 3,220 since 2021.
Unit 28 is quieter country: roughly half the hunter-days per square mile, 50 trailheads against 18's 35, and 67% huntable public. The flag is herd health — the bull:cow ratio dropped from 40 to 26 in one year, and success rates have trended down since 2020.
The trade in one line: the harvest data leans 18; the pressure data leans 28. One note for both — last winter's snowpack came in near 60% of median, so the model has the water weight up and the elevation ceiling higher than a normal year.
You make the call.
SourcesCPW harvest statsHerd estimatesSNOTELFire perimeters